09 Feb 2005
Swami replied:- Duty is different from attachment. Krishna is Narayana. Narayana is Shiva. Manmadha was the only son of Narayana. But when Manmadha committed a mistake, Narayana in the form of Shiva burnt His only son. Dhritharashtra had a hundred sons. He could not punish even one son (Duryodhana). This is the difference between a scholar and an ignorant person. An ignorant person does his duties with attachment to the bonds. A scholar also does his duties but without attachment to the bonds. All these family bonds are temporary and confined only to this birth. In the previous birth, you were not related and in the future birth you will not be related with them. Shankara has told that that which is temporary must be unreal (Yat Anityam Tat Kritakamhi Loke). The two actors were not father and son before the drama and will not be father and son after the drama. The bond is temporary and exists only during the drama. But if you analyze further, even during the drama they are not father and son. Therefore that which is temporary must be unreal in the past, present and future. That which is permanent is always real. If you realize this divine knowledge of Shankara you can cut all your worldly bonds. Shankara left His old mother for the sake of the Lord. He practiced whatever He preached.
Also Read
How Can One Overcome The Family Bonds?
Posted on: 08/12/2021What Is The Duty Of A Woman In The World?
Posted on: 14/12/2019Why Is That Chandralekha Could Not Overcome Her Family Bonds When They Competed With God?
Posted on: 12/03/2022What Is The Reason For Very Strong Attachment To One's Mother Over Other Family Bonds?
Posted on: 02/09/2022
Related Articles
How To Realize The Unreality Of The Worldly Bonds In Practice?
Posted on: 26/05/2009Realized Human Being Knows The Unreality Of Bonds
Posted on: 11/08/2012If The Mother Of A Son Is Born As His Wife In The Next Birth, Is It Not A Sin?
Posted on: 23/04/2023Swami, People Say That A Married Bond Stays For 7 Janmas. Is That True?
Posted on: 05/08/2021