home
Shri Datta Swami

 Posted on 04 Jul 2026. Share

Shri Raajiiva Gita: Chapter-11: The Association of Enquiry of the Power of God (Verses 1-20)

(Śakti Vicāra Yogaḥ)

Verses
1-20      
Jump to other chapters →

Śrī Rājīva Uvāca:-
[Śrī Rajiiv Spoke]:-

Śakti śaktima dekatvaṃ,
śrūyate kiṃ tu sarvataḥ।
Adhikaṃ Brahma sarvoktaṃ,
vyāghātaḥ katha manvitaḥ?॥

[We hear that the possessor of power and the power are one and the same. But everyone says that God (Brahman), the possessor of unimaginable power, is greater than all the greatest items. Hence, the question arises whether God is greater than His power or God is equal to His power. How to correlate this contradiction?]

 

Śrī Datta Bhagavān Uvāca:-
[God Śrī Datta Spoke]:-

Gṛhyatām ātapaś cārkaḥ,
dṛṣṭānto laukiko'pyayam।
Lokātīta malaukyaṃ ca,
loka dṛṣṭānta rūpi ca॥

[Let us take the example of sunlight (the power of Sun) and Sun (possessor of Sunlight). This is a worldly example. The divine concept may be beyond the worldly example or may be similar to the worldly example as well.]

 

Brahma sarva śakti mattvāt,
kuryād viśeṣa karma ca।
Sāmānyamapi kuryā ttat,
sādhyāsādhya kriyā karam॥

[Brahman is said to be omnipotent. Due to the capacity of omnipotence, Brahman can do any impossible action and Brahman can also do a possible action like an ordinary person. That is why Brahman is called the doer of both possible and impossible actions.]

 

Ataḥ prakṛti dṛṣṭāntaiḥ,
Brahma mātuṃ na śakyate।
Nohyaṃ jagati no dṛṣṭaṃ,
tannohyam upamā katham?॥

[Therefore, we cannot understand the unimaginable Brahman with the help of examples in the world because in this world, there is no any item, which is unimaginable. No unimaginable item is seen in this world and Brahman alone is unimaginable. In such a case, how can we take any worldly example comparable to Brahman to understand Brahman?]

 

Nohyaṃ lokātīta muktam,
iti kiṃ loka karmakṛt।
Śatavān daśavāṃś ca api,
nohya kṛd ūhya kṛt ca tat॥

[Since there is no unimaginable example in the world, can we say that Brahman is always beyond the world? It is certainly beyond the world, but it can also act like a worldly example if it likes so. A person earning Rs. 100 can also be said as the person earning Rs. 10. Doer of impossible things can also be the doer of possible things.]

 

Vyākhyātuṃ loka viṣayaṃ,
laukikais saha tarkyatām।
Alaukike tathā naiva,
tadekaṃ tarkyatāṃ sadā॥

[If we want to discuss an imaginable worldly matter, we can take the other imaginable worldly examples and analyze our imaginable worldly matter. Like this, we cannot analyze the unimaginable matter with the help of imaginable worldly examples. We always have to analyse the unimaginable matter independently, keeping the omnipotence of the unimaginable God in our view.]

 

Tarkātītaṃ yato Daivaṃ,
tarka viśleṣaṇaṃ katham?।
Iti mā saṃśayo Brahma,
tarkātītaṃ ca tarkagam॥

[You may question how we can analyze the unimaginable God because He is beyond logic. Analysis needs a basis of logic. You need not doubt like this. The reason is that though God is beyond logic, He does anything logically only.]

 

Sarva śakti mato'pyasya,
kārya mevo citaṃ sadā।
Sarvacchettā sutā kaṇṭhaṃ,
kiṃ chinatti nirūpaṇe?॥

[Suppose a person exists with the capacity to cut anything in the world. Suppose somebody asks him to cut his daughter’s neck to prove that he can cut anything in the world. To prove himself as the most powerful cutter, will he cut his daughter’s neck? Hence, even omnipotent God does things, which are proper and logical only.]

 

Kiṃ Daiva makarod itthaṃ,
tarkayāmo hyadhiṣṭhitāḥ।
Anusṛtyocitaṃ dharmaṃ,
tarkair niścitya tanmatam॥

[Based on this principle, we can infer God’s action in a particular case through logical discussion. Therefore, we can conclude that the omnipotent God always acts in accordance with divine wisdom and is ultimately consistent with propriety and reason, although God Himself transcends the limits of human logic.]

 

Ayam aucitya siddhāntaḥ,
sāhitye'pi sa uttamaḥ।
Mahāśakte ranaucityaṃ,
nindantyapi vicakṣaṇāḥ॥

This is called the ‘Theory of Properness of Anything’. Even in literature, this is given a very high place, which means that a proper word must be used in a proper context concentrating on its suitability to the context. Everybody has knowledge of all the words, but only a talented scholar uses a specific word suitable to the context of the situation. Critics criticize a word used in an improper unsuitable context.]

 

Buddher bhautika śakteś ca,
śakti ratyadhikocyate।
Na tatsama iti khyātaḥ,
Vede nocita kṛt katham?॥

[The capability of intelligence is said to be greater than mere physical capability. The Veda says that God is the highest and no item or thing is equal to God. How can such God do improper things just because He is capable of doing anything?]

 

Sūryātapa vicāre tu,
guṇa sāmyaṃ pramāṇa bhit।
Ātapaṃ sahate jīvaḥ,
na sūryaṃ sannidhi sthitaḥ॥

[If we analyze the Sun and sunlight as possessor of power and power respectively, there is qualitative similarity between the two, but there is a lot of quantitative difference between the Sun and sunlight. A human being can stand in sunlight and can tolerate it, but no human being can stand very close to Sun and tolerate the Sun directly.]

 

Uṣṇa tejo'ntaraṃ māne,
sāmyaṃ dviguṇayo rapi।
Ātapaṃ vidyudīkartuṃ,
śakyate na raviṃ tathā॥

[The light and heat in qualitative sense exist as two different associated qualities in the Sun and sunlight. But, the quantity of these two qualities also differs between the Sun and sunlight. One can transform sunlight into electricity but, none can transform the Sun directly into electricity.]

 

Dvayo ratyadhikaṃ mānaṃ,
sūrye laghu tadātape।
Brahmādhikatamaṃ jñātaṃ,
sādhutvenopa mīyatām॥

[In Sun, the quantity of light and heat is enormous, whereas the quantity of light and heat is very little in the sunlight. This example suits well to our concept about God and His power. We know from the Veda that God is the highest, who can be compared to the Sun having very very huge quantity of light and heat compared to sunlight.]

 

Mādhvaṃ mata midaṃ,
Viṣṇos Śrī śakti ranvitā।
Sarvādhikyaṃ Hare reva,
Śrīs tu sarvetarādhikā॥

[This concept follows the philosophy of Śrī Madhva. The power of God Viṣṇu called Śrī or Lakṣmī follows Lord Viṣṇu as a servant. But this power is greater than any other servant of God Viṣṇu.]

 

Sāmyaṃ Rāmānuje nāptaṃ,
śaṅkareṇā'dhikaṃ tataḥ।
Premṇaivaṃ krīyate bhartrā,
trigurūṇāṃ samanvayaḥ॥

[Śrī Rāmānuja always treats the power of God Nārāyaṇa as equal to God. Śrī Śaṅkara gives even more status by saying that the power of God, which is the source of name and form, is the Saguṇa Brahman itself directly. A husband can sometimes treat his wife equal to him or even more than him due to his excess of love. Like this, the three Divine Preachers are correlated.]

 

Bhāmā pāda parīkṣiptaḥ,
Kṛṣṇa enā masevata।
Bhūdevatā tasya dāsī,
bhaktaṃ dhatte śirasyapi!॥

[Satyabhāmā hits God Kṛṣṇa with her foot, but God Kṛṣṇa serves her by pressing her feet. Actually, Satyabhāmā is the incarnation of Earth and is a clear servant of God Viṣṇu. God always keeps His devotee on His head!]

 

Etena śakte raunnatyaṃ,
Śākteya matam anvitam।
Adhikaṃ tu Brahmaṇo'nyat,
Vede naiva nirākṛtam॥

[By this, the superiority of the power of God is possible when God serves her (power) due to His excess of love and thus, the philosophy of the Śākteya school is correlated. More powerful item than God is rejected even by the Veda itself (Na tat sama ścā bhyadhikaśca…).]

 

Nārāyaṇaś ca Viṣṇuś ca,
Ādhārārthe samā vubhau।
Rāmānujasya Madhvena,
Na virodhas sa kevalaḥ॥

[The Veda says that God is the beginning part of the tail (region around anus) that is the base of the seat for the whole world (Brahma pucchaṃ pratiṣṭhā…). God Narayana (Nārāṇām ayanam) of Śrī Rāmānuja and God Viṣṇu (Ādhāra rūpeṇa sarvādheyasya vyāpakatvena āśrayaḥ) of Śrī Madhva are one and the same because the meaning of both these words is the same, which is that God is the basic seat for the world. Hence, both are correlated. Both Nārāyaṇa and Viṣṇu are one and the same God.]

 

Svabhāva sahajā śaktiḥ,
na pṛthak karaṇe kṣamā।
Śaktir bhidyeta sūryān no,
bhinnā'pi bahir ātapaḥ॥

[Power is present in the possessor of power in inseparable state and you cannot differentiate it like the original inherent light and heat of the Sun. Such power is not at all different from the possessor of power. But some light and heat (very little power) comes out that are separated from Sun as sunlight.]

To be continued...


Chapters:

Chapter-1: The Association of Enquiry of Correlation of Three Vedantic Philosophies

Chapter-2: The Association of Enquiry of the Difference Between God and Soul

Chapter-3: The Association of Enquiry of the Difference Between God and World

Chapter-4: The Association of Enquiry of the Incarnation

Chapter-5: The Association of Enquiry of the Monism and Dualism

Chapter-6: The Association of Enquiry of the Difference Among Three Divine Philosophies

Chapter-7: The Association of Enquiry of the Analysis of the Three Divine Philosophies

Chapter-8: The Association of Enquiry of the Qualified Monism

Chapter-9: The Association of Enquiry of the Fundamental Component of Creation

Chapter-10: The Association of Enquiry of the Saankhya Accepting God

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

 
 whatsnewContactSearch
Share Via